{"id":8469,"date":"2021-10-13T22:41:29","date_gmt":"2021-10-13T22:41:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ncjolt.org\/?p=8469"},"modified":"2021-10-13T22:41:29","modified_gmt":"2021-10-13T22:41:29","slug":"ephemeral-messaging-applications-and-the-presidency-how-to-keep-the-president-from-blocking-the-sunshine","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/articles\/volume-23\/volume-23-issue-1\/ephemeral-messaging-applications-and-the-presidency-how-to-keep-the-president-from-blocking-the-sunshine\/","title":{"rendered":"EPHEMERAL MESSAGING APPLICATIONS AND THE PRESIDENCY: HOW TO KEEP THE PRESIDENT FROM BLOCKING THE SUNSHINE"},"content":{"rendered":"<a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2021\/10\/NCJOLT-Vol.23.1_166-213_Pope.pdf\" class=\"pdfemb-viewer\" style=\"\" data-width=\"max\" data-height=\"max\" data-mobile-width=\"500\"  data-scrollbar=\"none\" data-download=\"off\" data-tracking=\"on\" data-newwindow=\"on\" data-pagetextbox=\"off\" data-scrolltotop=\"off\" data-startzoom=\"100\" data-startfpzoom=\"100\" data-toolbar=\"bottom\" data-toolbar-fixed=\"off\">NCJOLT-Vol.23.1_166-213_Pope<br\/><\/a>\n<p class=\"wp-block-pdfemb-pdf-embedder-viewer\"><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Since the creation of Snapchat in 2011, many Americans regularly communicate via ephemeral messaging applications. While novel forms of communication technology\u2014such as e-mails or text messages\u2014have historically created complex record retention problems, ephemeral messaging applications are different because these applications delete messages by default. Thus, this deliberately ephemeral communication model presents unique challenges when used by a sitting United States President because the Presidential Records Act, which mandates record retention, leaves citizens powerless to prevent the President from destroying Presidential Records. This Article presents two potential solutions to this \u201cPresidential-sized\u201d problem. First, Congress could create a private right of action for citizens to challenge the President\u2019s use of ephemeral messaging applications to prevent the loss of important government records. Alternatively, since the government owns Presidential records, a President\u2019s use of ephemeral messaging applications could be treated as the destruction of government property.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Author: Caroline Madison Pope<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>PDF: <\/strong><a href=\"http:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\\\/ncjolt\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2021\/10\/NCJOLT-Vol.23.1_166-213_Pope.pdf\">http:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\\\/ncjolt\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2021\/10\/NCJOLT-Vol.23.1_166-213_Pope.pdf <\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Volume 23, Issue 1<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Since the creation of Snapchat in 2011, many Americans regularly communicate via ephemeral messaging applications. While novel forms of communication technology\u2014such as e-mails or text messages\u2014have historically created complex record retention problems, ephemeral messaging applications are different because these applications delete messages by default. Thus, this deliberately ephemeral communication model presents unique challenges when used <a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/articles\/volume-23\/volume-23-issue-1\/ephemeral-messaging-applications-and-the-presidency-how-to-keep-the-president-from-blocking-the-sunshine\/\" class=\"more-link\">&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[216],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8469"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8469"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8469\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8473,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8469\/revisions\/8473"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8469"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8469"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8469"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}