{"id":820,"date":"2012-06-30T21:49:51","date_gmt":"2012-06-30T21:49:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ncjolt.org\/\/?p=820"},"modified":"2020-06-04T20:54:08","modified_gmt":"2020-06-04T20:54:08","slug":"occupy-twitter","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/blogs\/occupy-twitter\/","title":{"rendered":"Occupy Twitter"},"content":{"rendered":"<div><strong>Monday, March 26th 2012 by\u00a0Margaret J. Pishko<\/strong><\/div>\n<div>\n&nbsp;<br \/>\nBy now, the\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/occupywallst.org\/\">Occupy<\/a>\u00a0Wall Street movement has become well known and widespread throughout in the United States. Claiming, \u201c<a href=\"http:\/\/occupywallst.org\/\">We Are the 99%<\/a>,\u201d this resistance movement seeks to \u201cempower real people to create\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/occupywallst.org\/\">real change<\/a>\u201d in order to build a better society free of the \u201cgreed and corruption of the\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/occupywallst.org\/\">1%<\/a>.\u201d They have also expanded outside of New York to cities throughout the country.<br \/>\n<img src=\"http:\/\/si.wsj.net\/public\/resources\/images\/OB-SH776_ows032_G_20120321153722.jpg\" alt=\"\" \/><br \/>\nThe participants utilize\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.twitter.com\/\">twitter<\/a>\u00a0as a free and broadly reaching outlet for discussion, announcement, and alerts. The movement\u2019s official\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/occupywallst.org\/\">website<\/a>\u00a0endorses the twitter handle\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/#!\/OccupyWallSt\">@OccupyWallSt<\/a>\u00a0to send out information. For instance, on Wednesday, March 21, 2012, @OccupyWallSt tweeted out a warning:\u00a0 \u201c#NYPD gathers around #UnionSq, lights-blazin.&#8217;\u201d<br \/>\nIn the wake of the arrests of hundreds of occupiers for lower level charges, such as disorderly conduct,<a href=\"http:\/\/online.wsj.com\/article\/SB10001424052702304724404577293960265255318.html?KEYWORDS=twitter\">prosecutors<\/a>\u00a0have begun to use occupiers\u2019 twitter handles against them.\u00a0 Prosecutors are using occupiers\u2019 tweets to establish \u201c<a href=\"http:\/\/online.wsj.com\/article\/SB10001424052702304724404577293960265255318.html?KEYWORDS=twitter\">intent to break the law<\/a>.\u201d This element has previously been an\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/online.wsj.com\/article\/SB10001424052702304724404577293960265255318.html?KEYWORDS=twitter\">issue<\/a>\u00a0for prosecutors to establish prior to the subpoenas because of the group nature of the arrests.<br \/>\nRecently,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/online.wsj.com\/article\/SB10001424052702304724404577293960265255318.html?KEYWORDS=twitter\">Jeff Rae<\/a>\u00a0was arrested during a large march in New York City. After his arrest, Rae pledged to fight the charges of disorderly conduct believing he had a claim for entrapment. However, when prosecutors\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/online.wsj.com\/article\/SB10001424052702304724404577293960265255318.html?KEYWORDS=twitter\">subpoenaed<\/a>\u00a0his twitter account, they found a tweet from Rae during the march that said, \u201c<a href=\"http:\/\/online.wsj.com\/article\/SB10001424052702304724404577293960265255318.html?KEYWORDS=twitter\">I will tweet until I&#8217;m cuffed ;).<\/a>&#8221; Threatening to use this tweet to establish Rae\u2019s intent to break the law, prosecutors convinced Rae to accepted a plea bargain instead of fight the charges. Rae describing the experience as \u201c<a href=\"http:\/\/online.wsj.com\/article\/SB10001424052702304724404577293960265255318.html?KEYWORDS=twitter\">fighting the king . . . it seemed like a lot of power was in their hands<\/a>.\u201d The\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/online.wsj.com\/article\/SB10001424052702304724404577293960265255318.html?KEYWORDS=twitter\">plea bargain<\/a>allows the charge to be expunged as long as Rae does not cause problems over the next six months.<br \/>\nIn the case of\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/online.wsj.com\/article\/SB10001424052702304724404577293960265255318.html?KEYWORDS=twitter\">Malcolm Harris<\/a>, arrested on the same day as Jeff Rae, prosecutors claimed that Harris\u2019s tweets that day \u201c<a href=\"\/Documents%20and%20Settings\/ME\/My%20Documents\/Downloads\/made%20clear%25E2%2580%25A6that%20he%20was%20well%20aware%20of%20the%20police%20instructions%20that%20day,%20and%20acted%20with%20the%20intent%20of%20obstructing%20traffic%20on%20the%20bridge\">made clear\u2026that he was well aware of the police instructions that day, and acted with the intent of obstructing traffic on the bridge<\/a>.\u201d He has not yet expected a plea bargain.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;Threatening to use this tweet to establish Rae\u2019s intent to break the law, prosecutors convinced Rae to accepted a plea bargain instead of fight the charges.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Currently, the New York Police Department is investigating another tweet that stated \u201c<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nydailynews.com\/opinion\/occupy-wall-street-kill-cops-tweet-hurt-article-1.1047088?localLinksEnabled=false\">We wont make a different if we dont kill a cop or 2<\/a>.\u201d The tweet alleged came from a man in Florida watching an Occupy demonstration that ended in a clash between demonstrators and police in\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.foxnews.com\/us\/2012\/03\/19\/new-york-police-probe-kill-cop-tweet-linked-to-occupy-wall-street-protests\/\">Zuccotti Park<\/a>.\u00a0 For obvious reasons, this tweet caused an uproar in the New York Police Department, which immediately began a search for the author of the threat.\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nydailynews.com\/opinion\/occupy-wall-street-kill-cops-tweet-hurt-article-1.1047088?localLinksEnabled=false\">The alleged perpetrators\u00a0<\/a>says the tweet is unrelated to the protests and defended the statement claiming, \u201c<a href=\"\">It&#8217;s not like I meant anything of it. Who takes anything like that seriously? I&#8217;m in Florida, what am I going to do?<\/a>&#8221;<br \/>\nAttorneys for the occupy protesters argue that the subpoenas are \u201c<a href=\"http:\/\/online.wsj.com\/article\/SB10001424052702304724404577293960265255318.html?KEYWORDS=twitter\">heavy-handed<\/a>\u201d and \u201c<a href=\"http:\/\/online.wsj.com\/article\/SB10001424052702304724404577293960265255318.html?KEYWORDS=twitter\">overkill<\/a>.\u201d Harris\u2019s attorney, Martin Solar, even described the prosecutor\u2019s attempts as \u201c<a href=\"http:\/\/online.wsj.com\/article\/SB10001424052702304724404577293960265255318.html?KEYWORDS=twitter\">an attempt by the DA&#8217;s office to use a sledgehammer to squash a gnat<\/a>.\u201d He has motioned to have the Harris\u2019s subpoena removed in order to protect his client from this attack on his right of free speech.<br \/>\nOccupiers have described the subpoenas as \u201c<a href=\"http:\/\/online.wsj.com\/article\/SB10001424052702304724404577293960265255318.html?KEYWORDS=twitter\">a chilling effect on our free speech rights and the waste of taxpayer money to peruse individual&#8217;s public and private communications.<\/a>\u201d However, they claim the threats and subpoenas will not stop their efforts.\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Monday, March 26th 2012 by\u00a0Margaret J. Pishko &nbsp; By now, the\u00a0Occupy\u00a0Wall Street movement has become well known and widespread throughout in the United States. Claiming, \u201cWe Are the 99%,\u201d this resistance movement seeks to \u201cempower real people to create\u00a0real change\u201d in order to build a better society free of the \u201cgreed and corruption of the\u00a01%.\u201d <a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/blogs\/occupy-twitter\/\" class=\"more-link\">&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[51],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/820"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=820"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/820\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7708,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/820\/revisions\/7708"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=820"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=820"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=820"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}