{"id":6773,"date":"2020-04-23T17:52:00","date_gmt":"2020-04-23T17:52:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/jolt\/?p=6773"},"modified":"2020-09-26T18:56:10","modified_gmt":"2020-09-26T18:56:10","slug":"the-danger-of-dealers-choice-why-state-by-state-regulation-of-online-sports-betting-is-not-enough","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/articles\/the-danger-of-dealers-choice-why-state-by-state-regulation-of-online-sports-betting-is-not-enough\/","title":{"rendered":"THE DANGER OF DEALER\u2019S CHOICE: WHY STATE-BY-STATE REGULATION OF ONLINE SPORTS BETTING IS NOT ENOUGH"},"content":{"rendered":"<a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2020\/04\/Faulconer_Final.pdf\" class=\"pdfemb-viewer\" style=\"\" data-width=\"max\" data-height=\"max\" data-mobile-width=\"500\"  data-scrollbar=\"none\" data-download=\"off\" data-tracking=\"on\" data-newwindow=\"on\" data-pagetextbox=\"off\" data-scrolltotop=\"off\" data-startzoom=\"100\" data-startfpzoom=\"100\" data-toolbar=\"bottom\" data-toolbar-fixed=\"off\">Faulconer_Final<br\/><\/a>\n<p class=\"wp-block-pdfemb-pdf-embedder-viewer\"><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Abstract: <\/strong>In 2018, the Supreme Court struck down the federal prohibition on<br>states\u2019 legalization of sports gambling, enabling states to legalize<br>and regulate the activity. As a result, numerous states have passed<br>sports gambling legislation, making it now legal in nineteen states<br>and the District of Columbia. However, no state regulation looks<br>alike. Given the criminal associations of past sports gambling and<br>the privacy and security issues imbedded in the use of sports betting<br>technology, there is a need for strong, proactive, and consistent<br>federal sports betting regulation, particularly as it relates to online<br>gambling activities. This paper explores the evolution of online<br>sports gambling policies and the gaps in the current state-by-state<br>regulatory scheme, in addition to discussing the necessary<br>components of a viable national solution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Author:\u00a0<\/strong>\u00a0\u00a0Lily Faulconer<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>PDF:<\/strong>&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\\\/ncjolt\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2020\/04\/Faulconer_Final.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\\\/ncjolt\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2020\/04\/Faulconer_Final.pdf <\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Volume:<\/strong>&nbsp;Volume 21, Issue 4<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Abstract: In 2018, the Supreme Court struck down the federal prohibition onstates\u2019 legalization of sports gambling, enabling states to legalizeand regulate the activity. As a result, numerous states have passedsports gambling legislation, making it now legal in nineteen statesand the District of Columbia. However, no state regulation looksalike. Given the criminal associations of past sports <a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/articles\/the-danger-of-dealers-choice-why-state-by-state-regulation-of-online-sports-betting-is-not-enough\/\" class=\"more-link\">&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[5,97],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6773"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6773"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6773\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8053,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6773\/revisions\/8053"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6773"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6773"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6773"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}