{"id":592,"date":"2012-06-16T18:57:55","date_gmt":"2012-06-16T18:57:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ncjolt.org\/\/?p=592"},"modified":"2020-06-04T20:54:25","modified_gmt":"2020-06-04T20:54:25","slug":"search-engines-score-another-perfect-10-the-continued-misuse-of-copyrighted-images-on-the-internet","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/articles\/search-engines-score-another-perfect-10-the-continued-misuse-of-copyrighted-images-on-the-internet\/","title":{"rendered":"Search Engines Score Another Perfect 10: The Continued Misuse of Copyrighted Images on the Internet"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In Kelly v. Arriba Soft Corp., the Ninth Circuit held that search engines&#8217; reproduction of images for use as thumbnails is a fair use under the Copyright Act. This Recent Development critiques the Ninth Circuit&#8217;s analysis in determining whether a search engine infringed on a copyright holder&#8217;s rights. The author proposes that this ruling broadened the scope of fair use on the Internet. As a result, Kelly does not fulfill copyright law&#8217;s goal of providing a balance between the rights of the copyright holder and the rights of the general public. However, a recent ruling against the search engine Google may be one of the first steps toward curtailing search engines&#8217; power.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In Kelly v. Arriba Soft Corp., the Ninth Circuit held that search engines&#8217; reproduction of images for use as thumbnails is a fair use under the Copyright Act. This Recent Development critiques the Ninth Circuit&#8217;s analysis in determining whether a search engine infringed on a copyright holder&#8217;s rights. The author proposes that this ruling broadened <a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/articles\/search-engines-score-another-perfect-10-the-continued-misuse-of-copyrighted-images-on-the-internet\/\" class=\"more-link\">&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[5,33,35],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/592"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=592"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/592\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7794,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/592\/revisions\/7794"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=592"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=592"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=592"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}