{"id":3280,"date":"2015-01-29T06:36:02","date_gmt":"2015-01-29T06:36:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ncjolt.org\/?p=3280"},"modified":"2020-06-04T20:53:39","modified_gmt":"2020-06-04T20:53:39","slug":"dea-creates-massive-database-of-license-plates","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/blogs\/dea-creates-massive-database-of-license-plates\/","title":{"rendered":"DEA Creates Massive Database of License Plates"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) is operating a national program to form a database vehicle license plates coordinated with other law enforcement agencies, according to a recent American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) Freedom of Information (FOIA) <a href=\"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/blog\/technology-and-liberty-criminal-law-reform\/foia-documents-reveal-massive-dea-program-record-ame\">request<\/a>. Although a February 2014 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/world\/national-security\/dhs-cancels-national-license-plate-tracking-plan\/2014\/02\/19\/a4c3ef2e-99b4-11e3-b931-0204122c514b_story.html\">Washington Post<\/a> article indicated that the Department of Homeland Security\u2019s License Plate Reading Program had been discontinued, this program operates independently.<br \/>\nThe ACLU claims that while the DEA responded to the FOIA request, the information they received is incomplete. The organization says that many of the documents are undated or outdated, and that therefore, many aspects of the program remain a mystery.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The ACLU <a href=\"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/blog\/technology-and-liberty-criminal-law-reform\/foia-documents-reveal-massive-dea-program-record-ame\">fears<\/a> a \u201ccentralized repository\u201d of information on America\u2019s drivers\u2014 \u201ca detailed and invasive depiction of our lives.\u201d The ACLU is concerned that this data could \u201cpotentially tag[] people as criminals without due process.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>For example, one document the ACLU uncovered <a href=\"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/files\/assets\/Pages%20from%2030890-30907%202013.08.28%20-%20DEA%20Response.pdf\">indicates<\/a> that the \u201cDEA has deployed at least 100 license plate readers across the United States . . . [including] California, Arizona, New Mexico, Texas, Florida, Georgia, Nevada, and New Jersey.\u201d Additionally, the ACLU fears that the information the DEA is collecting could be used for discriminatory <a href=\"http:\/\/www.aclu-il.org\/traffic-stop-data-shows-persistent-patterns-of-racial-bias-according-to-new-report\/\">purposes<\/a>, as other studies indicate that racial profiling continues to be a \u201ctroubling problem.\u201d<br \/>\nThe ALCU maintains that Americans need more information to understand the reaches of its program. Some unanswered questions include the amount of money the DEA is spending on this program, where the readers are located, how many of them are, and what policies govern the usage of these devices.<br \/>\nOne <a href=\"https:\/\/www.fbo.gov\/index?s=opportunity&amp;mode=form&amp;id=a0459e93674685daf7c08cfa3db0ed2e&amp;tab=core&amp;tabmode=list&amp;=\">update<\/a> indicates that the License Plate Reader system includes, \u201c53 fixed cameras, 24 barrel cameras, and 47 license plate reader trailers. These cameras are distributed in 12 locations in East Texas, 21 location in West Texas and New Mexico, 6 locations in Arizona, and 6 locations in California.\u201d However, the ACLU complains that this 2012 contract for license plate readers might be outdated, and also does not clarify the status of the number of license plate readers in other regions.<br \/>\nThe ACLU is not the only party worried about this program. The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.wsj.com\/articles\/u-s-spies-on-millions-of-cars-1422314779\"><em>Wall Street Journal<\/em><\/a> reports that \u201cSen. Patrick Leahy, senior Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, said the government\u2019s use of license-plate readers \u2018raises significant privacy concerns. The fact that this intrusive technology is potentially being used to expand the reach of the government\u2019s asset-forfeiture efforts is of even greater concern.\u2019\u2019\u2019<br \/>\nOthers have come out in defense of the program. A spokesperson for the DEA maintains that the \u201cprogram complies with federal law. \u2018It is not new that the DEA uses the license-plate reader program to arrest criminals and stop the flow of drugs in areas of high trafficking intensity,\u2019 the spokesman said.\u201d Furthermore, in 2010, DEA documents <a href=\"http:\/\/www.wsj.com\/articles\/u-s-spies-on-millions-of-cars-1422314779\">reported<\/a> \u201cthe database aided in the seizure of 98 kilograms of cocaine, 8,336 kilograms of marijuana and the collection of $866,380.\u201d<br \/>\nAlthough the<em> Journal<\/em> reports that the purpose of the program is to \u201cseize cars, cash and other assets to combat drug trafficking,\u201d the controversy indicates the ongoing tensions between security and privacy, and the questionable limits of government surveillance.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) is operating a national program to form a database vehicle license plates coordinated with other law enforcement agencies, according to a recent American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) Freedom of Information (FOIA) request. Although a February 2014 Washington Post article indicated that the Department of Homeland Security\u2019s License Plate Reading Program <a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/blogs\/dea-creates-massive-database-of-license-plates\/\" class=\"more-link\">&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3281,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[51],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3280"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3280"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3280\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7387,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3280\/revisions\/7387"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3281"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3280"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3280"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/ncjolt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3280"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}