{"id":511,"date":"2016-10-24T03:17:11","date_gmt":"2016-10-24T07:17:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/firstamendmentlawreview\/?page_id=511"},"modified":"2024-09-27T20:22:37","modified_gmt":"2024-09-27T20:22:37","slug":"volume-4","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/firstamendmentlawreview\/volumes\/volume-4\/","title":{"rendered":"Volume 4"},"content":{"rendered":"

Symposium Issue 2005<\/strong><\/p>\n

Who is a “Journalist”?<\/strong><\/em> by Howard Fineman<\/p>\n

The First Amendment, Journalism & Credibility: A Trio of Reforms for a Meaningful Free Press More than Three Decades after Tortilla<\/strong><\/em> by Clay Calvert<\/p>\n

An Unworkable Solution For a Non-Existent Problem: A Reply to Professor Calvert<\/strong><\/em> by Arnold H. Loewy<\/a><\/p>\n

Graham Kenan Professor of Law at UNC<\/p>\n

Faculty Advisor (Vol. 2-4)<\/p>\n

Credibility and the Press: A Response to Professor Loewy<\/strong><\/em> by Clay Calvert<\/p>\n

Swift Boat Vets in 2004: Press Coverage of an Independent Campaign<\/strong><\/em> by Albert L. May<\/p>\n

The Jurisprudence of the Media’s Access to Voting Polls<\/strong><\/em> by Blake D. Morant<\/p>\n

Spring Issue 2006<\/strong><\/p>\n

A Missed Opportunity to Abandon the Reasonable Observer Framework in Sacred Text Cases: McCreary County v. ACLU of Kentucky and Van Orden v. Perry <\/strong><\/em>by Susan Hanley Kosse<\/p>\n

Neuroscience and the In Corpore-ted First Amendment<\/strong> by <\/em>Rodney J.S. Deaton<\/p>\n

Holy Scriptures and Unholy Strictures: Why the Enforcement of a Religious Orthodoxy in North Carolina Demands a More Refined Establishment Clause Analysis of Courtroom Oaths<\/strong><\/em> by Daniel Blau<\/a><\/p>\n

University of North Carolina School of Law, Class of 2008<\/p>\n

Executive Editor (Vol. 5)<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Velazquez v. Legal Services Corporation: Unconstitutional Conditions and First Amendment Rights of Nonprofit Organizations and Their Donors<\/strong><\/em> by Edward Chaney<\/a><\/p>\n

University of North Carolina School of Law, Class of 2007<\/p>\n

Editor-in-Chief (Vol. 5)<\/p>\n

Hot Coffee and Freeze-Dried First Amendment Analysis: The Dubious Constitutionality of Using Private Ratings for Public Regulation of Video Games<\/strong><\/em> by William Cross<\/a><\/p>\n

University of North Carolina School of Law, Class of 2007<\/p>\n

Internal Communications Editor (Vol. 5)<\/p>\n

Interpreting Commercial Speech Under the Lanham Act?s Commercial Use Requirement: Tension Between Online Trademark and First Amendment Free Speech Rights<\/strong><\/em> by R. Kent Warren<\/a><\/p>\n

University of North Carolina School of Law, Class of 2006<\/p>\n

Staff Writer (Vol. 4)<\/p>\n

Protecting Homosexual Rights: A Contradiction in First Amendment Jurisprudence<\/strong><\/em> by Quinn White<\/a><\/p>\n

University of North Carolina School of Law, Class of 2008<\/p>\n

Publication Editor (Vol. 5)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Symposium Issue 2005 Who is a “Journalist”? by Howard Fineman The First Amendment, Journalism & Credibility: A Trio of Reforms for a Meaningful Free Press More than Three Decades after Tortilla by Clay Calvert An Unworkable Solution For a Non-Existent Problem: A Reply to Professor Calvert by Arnold H. Loewy Graham Kenan Professor of Law at UNC …<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":0,"parent":2218,"menu_order":4,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/firstamendmentlawreview\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/511"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/firstamendmentlawreview\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/firstamendmentlawreview\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/firstamendmentlawreview\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/firstamendmentlawreview\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=511"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/firstamendmentlawreview\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/511\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5460,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/firstamendmentlawreview\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/511\/revisions\/5460"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/firstamendmentlawreview\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2218"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/firstamendmentlawreview\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=511"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}