{"id":461,"date":"2016-10-24T03:17:25","date_gmt":"2016-10-24T07:17:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/firstamendmentlawreview\/?page_id=461"},"modified":"2024-09-27T20:19:25","modified_gmt":"2024-09-27T20:19:25","slug":"volume-10","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/firstamendmentlawreview\/volumes\/volume-10\/","title":{"rendered":"Volume 10"},"content":{"rendered":"

Fall Issue 2011<\/strong><\/p>\n

Revisiting the Right to Offend Forty Years After Cohen v. California: One Case’s Legacy on First Amendment Jurisprudence<\/strong><\/em> by Clay Calvert<\/p>\n

Civility in Government Meetings: Balancing First Amendment, Reputational Interests, and Efficiency<\/strong><\/em> by Terri Day & Erin Bradford<\/p>\n

Take One Step Forward: Federal Courts Continue to Find that Volunteers Are Shielded from Retaliation Based on Protected Speech Under the First Amendment<\/strong><\/em> by David A. Grenardo, Samuel D. Davis & Thomas M. Gutting<\/p>\n

Pearson v. Callahan and Qualified Immunity: Impact on First Amendment Law<\/strong><\/em> by David L. Hudson, Jr.<\/p>\n

The Skinny on the Federal Menu-Labeling Law & Why it Should Survive a First Amendment Challenge<\/strong><\/em> by Dayna B. Royal<\/p>\n

Symposium Issue 2012<\/strong><\/p>\n

Discrimination By and Against Religion<\/strong><\/em> by Martin E. Marty<\/p>\n

Treating Religion Differently<\/strong><\/em> by Melissa Rogers<\/p>\n

Still a Threshold Question: Refining the Ministerial Exception Post-Hosanna-Tabor <\/strong><\/em>by Mark E. Chopko & Marissa Parker<\/p>\n

Joyner v. Forsyth County Board of Commissioners: The Constitutionality of Sectarian Legislative Prayer<\/strong> by Katherine Lewis Parker<\/p>\n

RLUIPA and Mosques: Enforcing A Fundamental Right in Challenging Times<\/strong><\/em> by Eric Treene<\/p>\n

A First Amendment Analysis of Anti-Sharia Initiatives<\/strong><\/em> by Asma T. Uddin & Dave Pantzer<\/p>\n

Spring Issue 2012<\/strong><\/p>\n

Rules of General Applicability<\/strong><\/em> by Jeffrey M. Shaman<\/p>\n

Implications of Libel Doctrine For Nondefamatory Falsehoods Under the First Amendment<\/strong><\/em> by Nat Stern<\/p>\n

The Repercussions of Losing the Right to Respond: Why Matching Funds Should Be Constitutional for Judicial Elections Even After Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett<\/strong><\/em> by J. Alexandra Gonzales<\/p>\n

Cooking Up a New Lemon Test: The Establishment Clause, Displays of Religious Objects, and Lessons from India<\/strong><\/em> by Christopher J. Heaney<\/p>\n

Making the Argument that the Smith-Mundt Act Has Little Control over the Press’ Publication of U.S. Government-Produced Foreign News<\/strong><\/em> by Brett Holladay<\/p>\n

The Lost Democratic Institution of Petitioning: Public Employee Collective Bargaining as a Constitutional Right<\/strong><\/em> by Catherine Phillips<\/p>\n

Faith Healing Exceptions Versus Parens Patriae: Something’s Gotta Give<\/strong><\/em> by Rebecca Williams<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Fall Issue 2011 Revisiting the Right to Offend Forty Years After Cohen v. California: One Case’s Legacy on First Amendment Jurisprudence by Clay Calvert Civility in Government Meetings: Balancing First Amendment, Reputational Interests, and Efficiency by Terri Day & Erin Bradford Take One Step Forward: Federal Courts Continue to Find that Volunteers Are Shielded from Retaliation Based …<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":0,"parent":2218,"menu_order":10,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/firstamendmentlawreview\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/461"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/firstamendmentlawreview\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/firstamendmentlawreview\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/firstamendmentlawreview\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/firstamendmentlawreview\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=461"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/firstamendmentlawreview\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/461\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5446,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/firstamendmentlawreview\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/461\/revisions\/5446"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/firstamendmentlawreview\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2218"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/firstamendmentlawreview\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=461"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}