{"id":433,"date":"2016-10-24T00:00:23","date_gmt":"2016-10-24T04:00:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/firstamendmentlawreview\/?page_id=433"},"modified":"2024-09-27T20:19:58","modified_gmt":"2024-09-27T20:19:58","slug":"volume-12","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/firstamendmentlawreview\/volumes\/volume-12\/","title":{"rendered":"Volume 12"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align:center\"><strong>Fall Issue 2013<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Physicians, Firearms &amp; Free Expression: Reconciling First Amendment Theory with Doctrinal Analysis regarding the Right to Pose Questions to Patients<\/strong><\/em>&nbsp;by Clay Calvert; Daniel Axelrod; Justin B. Hayes; Minch Minchin<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>It&#8217;s My Party and I&#8217;ll Do What I Want to: Political Parties, UnconstituPhysicians, Firearms &amp; Free Expression: Reconciling First Amendment Theory with Doctrinal Analysis regarding the Right to Pose Questions to Patients<\/strong><\/em>&nbsp;by Clay Calvert; Daniel Axelrod; Justin B. Hayes; Minch Minchintional Conditions, and the Freedom of Association &#8211; Michael R. Dimino, Sr.<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Religious Liberty and the Financial War on Terror<\/strong><\/em>&nbsp;by Malick W. Ghachem<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Crushing Animals and Crashing Funerals: The Semiotics of Free Expression<\/strong><\/em>&nbsp;by Harold Anthony Lloyd<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>When Open Government and Academic Freedom Collide<\/strong><\/em>&nbsp;by Jonathan Peters; Charles N. Davis<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Constitutional Balancing in Need of Adjustment: On Defamation, Breaches of Confidentiality, and the Church<\/strong><\/em>&nbsp;by Mark P. Strasser<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align:center\"><strong>Symposium Issue 2014<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em><strong>A Dialogue on the Legacy of New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, The Keynote Address<\/strong><\/em>&nbsp;by Ken Paulson<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Weighing Constitutional Anchors: New York Times Co. v. Sullivan and the Misdirection of First Amendment Doctrine<\/strong><\/em>&nbsp;by Ronald A. Cass<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Reflections on New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 50 Years Later<\/strong><\/em>&nbsp;by Ashley Messenger<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>The Force of a Legal Concept: The Steady Extension of the Actual Malice Standard<\/strong><\/em>&nbsp;by Nat Stern<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>New York Times Co. v. Sullivan: No Joking Matter &#8211; 50 Years of Protecting Humor, Satire, and Jokers<\/strong><\/em>&nbsp;by Roy S. Gutterman<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Revitalizing Rosenbloom: The Matter of Public Concern Standard in the Age of the Internet<\/strong><\/em>&nbsp;by Amy Kristin Sanders; Holly Miller<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>How to Modestly Defend a Patently Defective Free Speech Rule<\/strong><\/em>&nbsp;by R. George Wright<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align:center\"><strong>Spring Issue 2014<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em><strong>An Update to Striking a Balance: Freedom of the Press versus Children&#8217;s Privacy Interests in Juvenile Dependency Proceedings<\/strong><\/em>&nbsp;by William Wesley Patton; Kelly Crecco<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Off-Label Promotion after United States v.&nbsp;<\/strong><\/em><b><i>Carbonia<\/i><\/b>&nbsp;by <a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/firstamendmentlawreview\/volume-13-masthead\/\">Brian M. Blood<\/a><\/p>\n<p>University of North Carolina School of Law, Class of 2015<\/p>\n<p>Articles &amp; Notes&nbsp;Editor&nbsp;(Vol. 13)<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Unanswered Prayers: Lund v. Rowan County and the Permissiveness of Sectarian Prayer in Municipalities<\/strong><\/em>&nbsp;by Kristopher L. Caudle<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Cooksey v. Futrell: The Fourth Circuit Illustrates How Informal Communications by State Authorities and Regulators Can Be Used to Establish Article III Standing and Ripeness in First Amendment Proceedings<\/strong><\/em>&nbsp;by <a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/firstamendmentlawreview\/volume-13-masthead\/\">Neal A. Inman<\/a><\/p>\n<p>University of North Carolina School of Law, Class of 2015<\/p>\n<p>Communications Editor (Vol. 13)<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Political Power, a Religious Agenda, and the Failings of the Endorsement Test: Hasidic Educational Separatism and the East Ramapo School Board<\/strong><\/em>&nbsp;by <a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/firstamendmentlawreview\/volume-12-masthead\/\">Kathleen Lockwood<\/a><\/p>\n<p>University of North Carolina School of Law, Class of 2014<\/p>\n<p>Staff Editor (Vol. 12)<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Put Your Mouth Where Your Money Is: How Political Organizations Profiteer off the First Amendment and What Congress Should Do about It<\/strong><\/em>&nbsp;by <a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/firstamendmentlawreview\/volume-13-masthead\/\">Philip A. Thompson<\/a><\/p>\n<p>University of North Carolina School of Law, Class of<\/p>\n<p>Articles &amp; Notes Editors (Vol. 13)<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Fall Issue 2013 Physicians, Firearms &amp; Free Expression: Reconciling First Amendment Theory with Doctrinal Analysis regarding the Right to Pose Questions to Patients&nbsp;by Clay Calvert; Daniel Axelrod; Justin B. Hayes; Minch Minchin It&#8217;s My Party and I&#8217;ll Do What I Want to: Political Parties, UnconstituPhysicians, Firearms &amp; Free Expression: Reconciling First Amendment Theory with Doctrinal <a href=\"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/firstamendmentlawreview\/volumes\/volume-12\/\" class=\"more-link\">&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":0,"parent":2218,"menu_order":12,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/firstamendmentlawreview\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/433"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/firstamendmentlawreview\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/firstamendmentlawreview\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/firstamendmentlawreview\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/firstamendmentlawreview\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=433"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/firstamendmentlawreview\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/433\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5449,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/firstamendmentlawreview\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/433\/revisions\/5449"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/firstamendmentlawreview\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2218"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.law.unc.edu\/firstamendmentlawreview\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=433"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}